- Understanding the TExES Chemistry 7-12 Pass Rate Data
- Why the Numbers Look the Way They Do
- Domain Breakdown: Where Points Are Won or Lost
- First-Attempt vs. Best-Attempt: What the Gap Means
- What a 240 Scaled Score Actually Requires
- Registration, Fees, and Retake Mechanics
- Who's Testing and Why It Matters
- A Study Approach Built Around the Data
- Frequently Asked Questions
- 2024-2025 first-attempt pass rate was 57%, with a 64% best-attempt rate across 81 examinees statewide.
- 2023-2024 numbers were lower: 49% first attempt, 52% best attempt, on 71 examinees.
- Domain II (Matter and Energy) carries 41% of the exam and disproportionately drives outcomes.
- Passing requires a scaled score of 240 on a 100-300 scale, not raw percentage correct.
Understanding the TExES Chemistry 7-12 Pass Rate Data
Anyone researching the TExES Chemistry 7-12 (240) exam eventually runs into the same question: how many candidates actually pass? The Texas Education Agency publishes program-level testing data by year, and the two most recent cycles tell a clear story about a small but shifting candidate pool.
In the 2024-2025 program year, 81 examinees attempted the exam. Of those, 57% passed on their first attempt, and the best-attempt pass rate (which counts anyone who eventually passed, including retakes) climbed to 64%. The prior year, 2023-2024, was tougher: 71 examinees posted a 49% first-attempt pass rate and a 52% best-attempt rate.
| Program Year | Examinees | First-Attempt Pass Rate | Best-Attempt Pass Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-2024 | 71 | 49% | 52% |
| 2024-2025 | 81 | 57% | 64% |
Two things stand out. First, the candidate pool is small compared to many other Texas certification exams, so year-to-year swings can look dramatic even when the underlying change is modest. Second, the improvement between the two years is real and worth eight percentage points on first attempt alone. That movement is consistent with more candidates using structured preparation rather than walking in cold.
Why the Numbers Look the Way They Do
Pass rates for a content-heavy science certification exam are shaped by three forces: the breadth of the content, the format of the questions, and how well candidates' coursework matches the framework the state actually tests. All three apply here.
The exam itself is a computer-administered test delivered through Pearson VUE testing centers under the Texas Educator Certification Examination Program. Candidates answer 100 selected-response questions inside a five-hour appointment window that includes a 15-minute tutorial and compliance agreement, leaving 4 hours 45 minutes of actual testing time. Some forms include unscored field-test items mixed in with scored questions, but only scored items count toward the final scaled result.
That format matters for pass-rate analysis because selected-response testing rewards precise recall and applied problem-solving over partial credit. There's no essay to salvage a weak multiple-choice run. A candidate who is strong in three domains but shaky in the largest one, Matter and Energy, can still fail outright even with solid overall preparation. For a full breakdown of every tested area, the TExES Chemistry 7-12 Exam Domains 2026 guide maps all 17 competencies across the four domains in detail.
Domain Breakdown: Where Points Are Won or Lost
The exam's content framework, carrying a 2022 TEA copyright, is organized into four domains and 17 competencies. Domain weighting is not evenly distributed, and that imbalance is the single biggest lever behind pass or fail outcomes.
Domain I: Scientific Inquiry and Processes (24%) - Competencies 001-004
Covers laboratory safety, experimental design, data analysis, and the nature of scientific reasoning as applied to chemistry classrooms.
- Interpreting lab data and identifying sources of experimental error
- Applying safety protocols specific to chemical storage and disposal
Domain II: Matter and Energy (41%) - Competencies 005-011
By far the largest domain, and the one that should anchor most study time. It spans atomic structure, gas laws, bonding, chemical notation, stoichiometry, solutions, and thermochemistry.
- Mastering stoichiometric calculations and mole-based conversions
- Distinguishing ionic, covalent, and metallic bonding behavior
- Applying gas laws and thermochemical calculations under timed conditions
Domain III: Chemical Reactions (23%) - Competencies 012-015
Focuses on reaction types, equilibrium, kinetics, and acid-base chemistry as they appear in secondary-level curricula.
- Balancing and classifying reaction equations quickly
- Predicting shifts in equilibrium using Le Chatelier's principle
Domain IV: Science Learning, Instruction and Assessment (12%) - Competencies 016-017
The smallest domain, but it tests pedagogical judgment specific to chemistry instruction, not general teaching theory.
- Designing formative assessment tied to chemistry misconceptions
- Sequencing instruction to build from concrete to abstract concepts
Because Domain II alone accounts for 41% of the scored items, a candidate who under-prepares stoichiometry, bonding, or thermochemistry is mathematically working against a much steeper climb than someone weak in Domain IV. This is exactly why the site's broader TExES Chemistry 7-12 Study Guide 2026 treats Matter and Energy as the backbone of a first-attempt strategy rather than one topic among many.
Key Takeaway
Allocate study time roughly in proportion to domain weight, not evenly across all four domains - Domain II alone deserves close to two-fifths of your total review hours.
First-Attempt vs. Best-Attempt: What the Gap Means
The gap between first-attempt and best-attempt pass rates is a useful diagnostic. In 2024-2025, the gap was seven points (57% to 64%); in 2023-2024, it was only three points (49% to 52%). A wider gap in the more recent year suggests more candidates who initially failed were able to retake and pass, which is a meaningfully different story than candidates simply giving up after one attempt.
Retaking is only useful within the state's structural limits. Candidates are allowed five attempts per certification exam and must wait 30 days between sittings. That waiting period is not a formality - it forces a real study cycle rather than a same-week resit, which likely contributes to the higher best-attempt figures. Anyone weighing whether the investment of a retake is worth it should also read the broader context in Is the TExES Chemistry 7-12 Certification Worth It?.
Score reporting typically posts about seven days after testing, at 10:00 p.m. Central on the published score report dates, so candidates planning a 30-day retake window should build in that reporting lag when scheduling.
What a 240 Scaled Score Actually Requires
Scores are reported on a 100-300 scale, with 240 set as the minimum passing score. That number is not a raw percentage of the 100 selected-response questions answered correctly - it's a scaled score derived only from scored items, since some forms include unscored questions being field-tested for future administrations. This distinction matters because candidates sometimes assume they need to answer 80% correctly to "pass with room to spare," when the actual conversion is not a simple percentage.
Because the scale runs from 100 to 300 with 240 as the cut point, a candidate's margin above or below that line is what shows up on the score report, not a percent-correct figure. For a deeper explanation of how scaled scoring works on this exam, see TExES Chemistry 7-12 Passing Score 2026: Exactly What You Need to Pass.
Registration, Fees, and Retake Mechanics
The exam fee is $116, with no separate member versus non-member pricing, though additional service fees may apply depending on how and where a candidate schedules. Before registering, most candidates need a TEA ID and must be admitted to an approved Texas educator preparation program with authorization to test, or qualify through certification by examination or an out-of-state credential review.
These mechanics matter for pass-rate context because they filter who actually sits for the exam. Unlike open-enrollment tests, the TExES Chemistry 7-12 pool is largely made up of candidates who have already cleared an EPP admission process, which is one reason the cohort size stays modest year over year. Full eligibility pathways are detailed in TExES Chemistry 7-12 Requirements 2026, and fee planning - including what happens on a retake - is broken down in TExES Chemistry 7-12 Certification Cost 2026.
If you're not sure when the next available testing window fits your preparation timeline, the TExES Chemistry 7-12 Exam Dates 2026 guide lays out scheduling and deadline mechanics through Pearson VUE.
Who's Testing and Why It Matters
The TExES Chemistry 7-12 (240) exists to certify secondary chemistry teachers under the Texas Education Agency's State Board for Educator Certification framework. Most examinees are pursuing initial certification through an approved educator preparation program, though some arrive via certification by examination or out-of-state credential review. This is a fundamentally different candidate profile than a generic content-knowledge test taken by a wide public audience.
Because the pool is almost entirely aspiring or transitioning secondary science teachers, pass-rate swings often track cohort-level factors - how many candidates in a given year came from strong undergraduate chemistry backgrounds, how many were completing an alternative certification route under time pressure, and how many had access to structured review material. If you're curious about where this credential leads once earned, TExES Chemistry 7-12 Jobs covers the hiring landscape for certified chemistry teachers.
A Texas standard certificate earned after passing is valid for five years, and renewal requires 150 continuing professional education clock hours per five-year period through ECOS, with at least 80% of those hours tied to the certificate area. That renewal structure reinforces that this is a career-long credential, not a one-time hurdle - which is worth keeping in perspective while grinding through Domain II practice sets.
A Study Approach Built Around the Data
Given that Domain II accounts for 41% of the exam and the statewide pass-rate gap between first and best attempts is largest in recent years, the most defensible use of limited study time is weighting effort to match domain size, then using short, focused review blocks rather than marathon sessions.
Domain II: Matter and Energy
- Stoichiometry, gas laws, bonding, and thermochemistry drills
- Timed practice sets using the on-screen periodic table and physical constants page, since both are provided during the real exam
Domain III: Chemical Reactions
- Reaction classification, equilibrium, and acid-base problem sets
- Practice with the on-screen scientific calculator to build speed
Domain I: Scientific Inquiry and Processes
- Lab safety scenarios and experimental design questions
- Data interpretation practice using graphs and tables
Domain IV plus full review
- Instructional design and assessment competencies
- A full-length 100-question timed simulation to rehearse the 4-hour-45-minute testing window
Short review cycles focused on one competency cluster at a time work better here than trying to re-read an entire textbook, because the exam rewards applied calculation speed as much as conceptual recall. For a competency-by-competency walkthrough of exactly what each domain covers, pair this timeline with the full domains guide, and gauge your overall readiness against the difficulty analysis before you schedule.
Once your review is structured, the most efficient way to confirm readiness is timed practice under real exam conditions. You can start building that familiarity now on the main practice test platform, where full-length simulations mirror the actual question format and pacing.
Key Takeaway
Spend roughly proportional time by domain weight, but end your prep with at least one full 100-question timed run before test day - pacing across nearly five hours is its own skill.
Frequently Asked Questions
For the 2024-2025 program year, TEA reported a 57% first-attempt pass rate and a 64% best-attempt pass rate across 81 examinees statewide.
Yes. The 2023-2024 program year reported a 49% first-attempt and 52% best-attempt pass rate on 71 examinees, meaning both figures rose in the following year.
Candidates are allowed up to five attempts per certification exam, with a mandatory 30-day waiting period between each attempt.
TEA does not publish domain-level pass rates, but because Domain II: Matter and Energy makes up 41% of the exam, weakness there has an outsized effect on overall scaled scores.
You need a scaled score of at least 240 on the 100-300 point scale; see the passing score guide for a full explanation of how that scale is calculated.